Consuelo Guayara Sánchez

I earned my M.A. and PhD. in the University of Iowa, as a human geographer with a specialty in Latin American Studies, focusing on economic, social, cultural, and political processes in which environmental concerns and issues are embedded. 
I have taught both in Colombia and the US at university level. In Colombia I taught in the area of economics and the environment. In the geography department at the University of Iowa, I have taught lower level courses including: Introduction to Human Geography, The Contemporary Global System, and Contemporary Environmental Issues. I have also enjoyed teaching upper level courses such as: Environment and Development, Gender and Environment, Geographic Perspectives on Development, and Special Topics (Globalization and Latin America, and Globalization, Environment and Latin America).
For the past five years, as a lecturer in the department of Rhetoric, my Rhetoric courses have also maintained a thematic focus on environment, development, technology, and the production of knowledge. My First Year Seminar, Humans and Environment: The Invisibility of Human Impact is a well- received course that introduces first year students to global perspectives and environmental awareness. 
During the past five summers, I have been investigating sustainable food production projects in Colombia, and presenting my results at international and national fora. I have conducted fieldwork in the municipalities of Riosucio and Anserma in the state of Caldas, a traditional coffee zone of Colombia, particularly by examining social and environmental practices of small associations of organic coffee producers in the search for reducing structural vulnerabilities and conditions of precarity, as well as promoting environmental sustainability in Colombia. Besides presenting the results at The Annual American Association of Geographers Meetings, I have had the opportunity of presenting my findings in Italy, and Canada at the International Conference on Food Studies, the latest one in October 2018.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post #8 (Ian)

Interesting take on that timeless grudge match been academic and creative nonfiction, but cringed at Goedde's frequent use of what I'll call The Other B-Word, which raised its own separate set of questions for me about how we (as tutors) shape the way our students write about racism... Though the use of this word felt central to Loraine's story - and was further complicated by Loraine's own Mexican-American heritage - it was also impossible for me to imagine Goedde parroting it with the same zeal if, say, this had been a story about Loraine using the N-word, or any number of other xenophobic slurs. Not sure if others reacted similarly, but felt noteworthy given the particular necessity (and thorniness) of having students write about race at a place as overwhelmingly white as the University of Iowa. As for comparing this nonfiction case study to the more academic studies we've previously consulted, I feel like the pros and cons basically mirror those raised by Goed
Read more

Blog Post #1

Reading: The University of Iowa Writing Center Tutor’s Guide Question: The University of Iowa Writing Center Tutor’s Guide starts stating the most important goal the Writing Center, “to develop strong writers with positive attitudes toward writing.” I clearly see how through the Writing Center’s writing practices students can grow in confidence to write. Are there any specific practices addressing that vital part of the WC goal of developing positive attitudes toward writing? Reading: The Bedford Guide for Writing Tutors, Chapter 1 & 2 Given that a student’s version of what transpires in a classroom “may be incomplete or even inaccurate (Ryan & Zimmerelli, 2016, 3), how professional and even ethical is to facilitate and somehow promote procedures for registering a complaint (4)?
Read more

JJ 7

I have yet to begin online/asynchronous tutoring but my initial impression (prior to the readings this week) was that the non face-to-face methods is an ersatz tutoring style. I was partially convinced by the readings that there are advantages in a more distanced approach to tutoring that are lacking with in-person sessions. Specifically, there is an element of anonymity associated with online tutoring that I can see appealing to students that may not be confident or are embarrassed about their writing, especially students that are more introverted and non-confrontational. As a tutor, asynchronous tutoring would give me the time to really digest the writing and carefully formulate a response. Sometimes after an in-person session I think back about better ways I could have phrased a certain point but by then, too late. A major take-away from the readings is that I will formulate my responses through the comment feature and rarely using track changes, if at all. I believe that carefully
Read more